DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Mega Cruiser vs 2000 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
Mega CruiserModelExplorer
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
4104 ccEngine displacement3958 cc
170 HPPower160 HP
422 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
108 ltFuel tank66 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
37/12,5 R17.5Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5090 mmLength4536 mm
2170 mmWidth1783 mm
2075 mmHeight1714 mm
2900 KgWeight1807 Kg
3395 mmWheelbase2593 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Mega Cruiser and 2000 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…