2014 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 2.4 (160 Hp) 2014Overall Score68.5/100
2014 Toyota Matrix vs 2014 Volvo V60 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Volvo
V60
Volvo V60 2.0 D4 (163 Hp) 2014Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo V60
ToyotaMakeVolvo
MatrixModelV60
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo V60
—0–100 km/h9,4 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
160 HPPower163 HP
225 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo V60
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo V60
4394 mmLength4635 mm
1765 mmWidth1825 mm
1549 mmHeight1484 mm
—Weight1731 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2776 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Toyota Matrix and 2014 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…