2013 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 2.4 (160 Hp) 2013Overall Score68.5/100
2013 Toyota Matrix vs 2013 Volvo S60 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.0 D3 (163 Hp) 2013Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo S60
ToyotaMakeVolvo
MatrixModelS60
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo S60
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
160 HPPower163 HP
225 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Toyota MatrixSpecificationVolvo S60
4394 mmLength4628 mm
1765 mmWidth1865 mm
1549 mmHeight1484 mm
—Weight1582 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2776 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Toyota Matrix and 2013 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…