2005 • Toyota
Matrix
Toyota Matrix 1.8i 16V (124 Hp) 2005Overall Score66.25/100
2005 Toyota Matrix vs 2005 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.8 TDCi (115 Hp) 2005Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota MatrixSpecificationFord C-Max
ToyotaMakeFord
MatrixModelC-Max
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota MatrixSpecificationFord C-Max
178 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
124 HPPower115 HP
161 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota MatrixSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota MatrixSpecificationFord C-Max
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota MatrixSpecificationFord C-Max
4350 mmLength4333 mm
1775 mmWidth1825 mm
1540 mmHeight1595-1601 mm
1215 KgWeight—
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Toyota Matrix and 2005 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…