DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Toyota MasterAce vs 1991 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota MasterAce

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

54.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAudi
MasterAceModel80
1991Model year1991
—Body typeSedan
—Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,1 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1975 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
83 HPPower90 HP
174 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

—Length4482 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1406 mm
—Weight1270 Kg
—Wheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Toyota MasterAce and 1991 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota MasterAce leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…