DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Toyota Mark II vs 2000 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
Mark IIModelXC70
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2492 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
250 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4775 mmLength4733 mm
1785 mmWidth1860 mm
1470 mmHeight1562 mm
—Weight1630 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2763 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Toyota Mark II and 2000 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…