DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Mark II vs 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMitsubishi
Mark IIModelLancer
2004Model year2008
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,7 s
230 km/hTop speed274 km/h
2492 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
280 HPPower295 HP
378 NmTorque366 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
20 ltUrban consumption—
12 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size245/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4735 mmLength4505 mm
1760 mmWidth1810 mm
1460 mmHeight1480 mm
1570 KgWeight1560 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Mark II and 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…