2010 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 3.0sd (286 Hp) 2010Overall Score86.75/100
2010 BMW X3 vs 2010 Cadillac BLS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Cadillac
BLS
Cadillac BLS 2.8i V6 24V (255) 2010Overall Score87.5/100
WINNER
Cadillac BLS
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X3SpecificationCadillac BLS
BMWMakeCadillac
X3ModelBLS
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationCadillac BLS
6,6 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
240 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
286 HPPower255 HP
580 NmTorque365 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationCadillac BLS
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X3SpecificationCadillac BLS
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R18Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationCadillac BLS
4569 mmLength4680 mm
1853 mmWidth1752 mm
1674 mmHeight1471 mm
1875 KgWeight—
2795 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 BMW X3 and 2010 Cadillac BLS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Cadillac BLS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…