DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW X3 vs 2003 Nissan X-Terra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Terra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeNissan
X3ModelX-Terra
2003Model year2003
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h—
224 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement3275 cc
231 HPPower210 HP
300 NmTorque313 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank73 lt
16,0 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size235/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4569 mmLength4520 mm
1853 mmWidth1790 mm
1674 mmHeight1860 mm
1835 KgWeight1900 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW X3 and 2003 Nissan X-Terra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Terra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…