DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Land Cruiser vs 2000 Chevrolet Impala Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Impala

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeChevrolet
Land CruiserModelImpala
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3378 ccEngine displacement3350 cc
178 HPPower182 HP
303 NmTorque279 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank65 lt
17,6 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/80 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4315 mmLength5080 mm
1820 mmWidth1855 mm
1870 mmHeight1455 mm
1755 KgWeight1500 Kg
2370 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Land Cruiser and 2000 Chevrolet Impala approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Impala leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…