2004 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 3.0d (218 Hp) 2004Overall Score78.75/100
2004 BMW X3 vs 2005 SsangYong Chairman Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • SsangYong
Chairman
SsangYong Chairman 3.2 i 24V (220 Hp) 2005Overall Score79.75/100
WINNER
SsangYong Chairman
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
78.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X3SpecificationSsangYong Chairman
BMWMakeSsangYong
X3ModelChairman
2004Model year2005
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationSsangYong Chairman
7,4 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
218 HPPower220 HP
500 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationSsangYong Chairman
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption17,1 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption10,8 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X3SpecificationSsangYong Chairman
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
235/55 R17Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationSsangYong Chairman
4569 mmLength5355 mm
1853 mmWidth1825 mm
1674 mmHeight1475 mm
1880 KgWeight1750 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase3200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 BMW X3 and 2005 SsangYong Chairman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…