DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 BMW X3 vs 2013 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC70
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelXC70
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC70
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
195 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
143 HPPower163 HP
360 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC70
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank70 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC70
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/60 R17 VTyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo XC70
4648 mmLength4838 mm
1881 mmWidth1870 mm
1661 mmHeight1604 mm
1660 KgWeight—
2810 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 BMW X3 and 2013 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…