DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 BMW X3 vs 2012 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 6
BMWMakeMazda
X3Model6
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 6
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
195 km/hTop speed211 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
360 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank62 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/60 R17 VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 6
4648 mmLength4865 mm
1881 mmWidth1840 mm
1661 mmHeight1450 mm
1660 KgWeight1405 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 BMW X3 and 2012 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…