2012 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2012Overall Score70.5/100
2012 BMW X3 vs 2016 Honda CR-V Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Honda
CR-V
Honda CR-V 1.6 i-DTEC (160 Hp) 2016Overall Score70.5/100
RESULT
Tie
The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.
70.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationHonda CR-V
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
195 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
143 HPPower160 HP
360 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationHonda CR-V
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank58 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X3SpecificationHonda CR-V
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears9
225/60 R17 VTyre size225/65 R17; 225/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationHonda CR-V
4648 mmLength4605 mm
1881 mmWidth2096 mm
1661 mmHeight1685 mm
1660 KgWeight1658 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2630 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 BMW X3 and 2016 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…