DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 BMW X3 vs 2009 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeVolkswagen
X3ModelPolo
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
195 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
143 HPPower130 HP
350 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/60 R17Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4569 mmLength3897 mm
1853 mmWidth1650 mm
1674 mmHeight1465 mm
1740 KgWeight1095 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 BMW X3 and 2009 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…