2002 • Toyota
Kluger
Toyota Kluger 2.4 16V (160 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
2002 Toyota Kluger vs 2002 Volvo C70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Volvo
C70
Volvo C70 2.4 i 20V (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Kluger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota KlugerSpecificationVolvo C70
ToyotaMakeVolvo
KlugerModelC70
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Toyota KlugerSpecificationVolvo C70
—0–100 km/h8,5 s
180 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2364 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
160 HPPower200 HP
221 NmTorque285 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota KlugerSpecificationVolvo C70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota KlugerSpecificationVolvo C70
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/70 R16 STyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota KlugerSpecificationVolvo C70
4685 mmLength4716 mm
1825 mmWidth1817 mm
1720 mmHeight1429 mm
1660 KgWeight1570 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Toyota Kluger and 2002 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Kluger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…