2003 • Toyota
Ist
Toyota Ist 1.5i (105 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Toyota Ist vs 2003 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V 4WD (97 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Ist
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota IstSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
ToyotaMakeChevrolet
IstModelTracker
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Toyota IstSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
105 HPPower97 HP
127 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota IstSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota IstSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota IstSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
3855 mmLength3650 mm
1695 mmWidth1630 mm
1530 mmHeight1650 mm
1000 KgWeight1235 Kg
2370 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Toyota Ist and 2003 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Ist leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…