DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 BMW X3 vs 2006 Fiat Croma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Croma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationFiat Croma
BMWMakeFiat
X3ModelCroma
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationFiat Croma
8,5 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
210 km/hTop speed216 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
218 HPPower200 HP
250 NmTorque400 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationFiat Croma
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationFiat Croma
4569 mmLength4756 mm
1853 mmWidth1775 mm
1674 mmHeight1597 mm
1730 KgWeight1650 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 BMW X3 and 2006 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…