E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW X3 vs 2004 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S60
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelS60
2004Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S60
8,9 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
208 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
192 HPPower210 HP
245 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S60
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S60
4569 mmLength4576 mm
1853 mmWidth1804 mm
1674 mmHeight1428 mm
1815 KgWeight1560 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW X3 and 2004 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2004 Volvo S60VS2004 BMW X3Volvo S60 vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model years2004 Volvo S80VS2004 BMW X3Volvo S80 vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model years2004 Volvo V70VS2004 BMW X3Volvo V70 vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model years2004 Kia OptimaVS2004 BMW X3Kia Optima vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVS2004 BMW X3Hyundai Grandeur/Azera vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model years

Comments are loading…