2006 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2.0i (150 Hp) 2006Overall Score68.25/100
2006 BMW X3 vs 2006 Toyota Caldina Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Toyota
Caldina
Toyota Caldina 2.0i (152 Hp) 2006Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Caldina
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X3SpecificationToyota Caldina
BMWMakeToyota
X3ModelCaldina
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationToyota Caldina
11,5 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower152 HP
200 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationToyota Caldina
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X3SpecificationToyota Caldina
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/55 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationToyota Caldina
4569 mmLength4510 mm
1853 mmWidth1740 mm
1674 mmHeight1445 mm
1660 KgWeight1240 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 BMW X3 and 2006 Toyota Caldina approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Caldina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…