DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 BMW X3 vs 2006 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationSaab 9-3
BMWMakeSaab
X3Model9-3
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationSaab 9-3
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
198 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower175 HP
200 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationSaab 9-3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationSaab 9-3
4569 mmLength4635 mm
1853 mmWidth1762 mm
1674 mmHeight1434 mm
1660 KgWeight1580 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 BMW X3 and 2006 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…