2006 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2.0i (150 Hp) 2006Overall Score68.25/100
2006 BMW X3 vs 2006 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi (136 Hp) 2006Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
BMW X3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
68.25–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationFord C-Max
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
198 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
200 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X3SpecificationFord C-Max
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationFord C-Max
4569 mmLength4330 mm
1853 mmWidth1820 mm
1674 mmHeight1600 mm
1660 KgWeight1391 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 BMW X3 and 2006 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, BMW X3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…