E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 BMW X3 vs 2006 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C30
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelC30
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C30
10,2 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
198 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
150 HPPower163 HP
330 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C30
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C30
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo C30
4569 mmLength4252 mm
1853 mmWidth1782 mm
1674 mmHeight1447 mm
1750 KgWeight1404 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 BMW X3 and 2006 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2006 Renault MeganeVS2006 BMW X3Renault Megane vs BMW X32006 and 2006 model years2006 Alfa Romeo 147VS2006 BMW X3Alfa Romeo 147 vs BMW X32006 and 2006 model years2006 Alfa Romeo 159VS2006 BMW X3Alfa Romeo 159 vs BMW X32006 and 2006 model yearsImage unavailableVS2006 BMW X3Alfa Romeo GT vs BMW X32006 and 2006 model years2006 Fiat CromaVS2006 BMW X3Fiat Croma vs BMW X32006 and 2006 model years

Comments are loading…