DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW X3 vs 2003 Volkswagen Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeVolkswagen
X3ModelBora
2004Model year2003
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
198 km/hTop speed216 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
330 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4569 mmLength4376 mm
1853 mmWidth1735 mm
1674 mmHeight1446 mm
1750 KgWeight1442 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2519 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW X3 and 2003 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…