DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW X3 vs 2003 BMW X5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW X5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points.

67.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationBMW X5
BMWMakeBMW
X3ModelX5
2004Model year2003
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationBMW X5
10,2 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
198 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
150 HPPower184 HP
330 NmTorque410 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationBMW X5
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank93 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationBMW X5
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationBMW X5
4569 mmLength4666 mm
1853 mmWidth1872 mm
1674 mmHeight1717 mm
1750 KgWeight2170 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW X3 and 2003 BMW X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW X5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…