DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Toyota Highlander vs 2014 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
HighlanderModelFlex
2017Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
8Seats6-7
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
296 HPPower364 HP
358 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank71 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
8Gears6
245/60 R18; 245/55 R19Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4890 mmLength5130 mm
1925 mmWidth1930 mm
1770 mmHeight1727 mm
2060 KgWeight—
2790 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Toyota Highlander and 2014 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…