DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Toyota Highlander vs 2012 Chrysler 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeChrysler
HighlanderModel200
2015Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3605 cc
280 HPPower287 HP
337 NmTorque353 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank64 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size225/55 R17; 225/50 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4870 mm
1925 mmWidth1843 mm
1730 mmHeight1482 mm
2205 KgWeight1622 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2765 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Toyota Highlander and 2012 Chrysler 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…