DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Toyota Highlander vs 2013 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
HighlanderModelXC70
2015Model year2013
SUVBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
249 HPPower243 HP
337 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption14 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/55 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4838 mm
1925 mmWidth1870 mm
1730 mmHeight1604 mm
2005 KgWeight1956 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Toyota Highlander and 2013 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…