DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Toyota Highlander vs 2013 Isuzu MU-X Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Highlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeIsuzu
HighlanderModelMU-X
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement2999 cc
245 HPPower177 HP
337 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size245/70 R16; 255/65 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4785 mmLength4825 mm
1910 mmWidth1860 mm
1760 mmHeight1825-1830 mm
2045 KgWeight1985-2025 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Toyota Highlander and 2013 Isuzu MU-X approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Highlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…