DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Highlander vs 2000 Nissan Largo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Highlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeNissan
HighlanderModelLargo
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement2388 cc
157 HPPower145 HP
221 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,67 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/70 R16Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4685 mmLength4610 mm
1825 mmWidth1745 mm
1735 mmHeight1905 mm
1580 KgWeight1620 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Highlander and 2000 Nissan Largo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Highlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…