2010 • Toyota
Harrier
Toyota Harrier 3.5 V6 24V (280 Hp) 2010Overall Score78.75/100
2010 Toyota Harrier vs 2010 Jaguar XJ Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Jaguar
XJ
Jaguar XJ 3.0 V6 D (275 Hp) 2010Overall Score79.25/100
WINNER
Jaguar XJ
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
78.75–79.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota HarrierSpecificationJaguar XJ
ToyotaMakeJaguar
HarrierModelXJ
2010Model year2010
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota HarrierSpecificationJaguar XJ
7,8 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
200 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
280 HPPower275 HP
346 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota HarrierSpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank82 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Toyota HarrierSpecificationJaguar XJ
4730 mmLength—
1845 mmWidth—
1680 mmHeight—
1835 KgWeight—
2715 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Toyota Harrier and 2010 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSPorsche Boxster vs Toyota Harrier2010 and 2010 model yearsImage unavailableVSJaguar XJ vs Toyota Harrier2010 and 2010 model years
VSLand Rover Discovery vs Toyota Harrier2010 and 2010 model years
VSLand Rover Range Rover Sport vs Toyota Harrier2010 and 2010 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Chairman vs Toyota Harrier2010 and 2010 model yearsComments are loading…