DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota Harrier vs 2013 Isuzu MU-X Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Harrier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeIsuzu
HarrierModelMU-X
2012Model year2013
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3310 ccEngine displacement2999 cc
211 HPPower177 HP
288 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,0 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size245/70 R16; 255/65 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4775 mmLength4825 mm
1845 mmWidth1860 mm
1690 mmHeight1825-1830 mm
1930 KgWeight1985-2025 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota Harrier and 2013 Isuzu MU-X approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…