DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Toyota Harrier vs 2000 Toyota Highlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Highlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
HarrierModelHighlander
1999Model year2000
SUV, CrossoverBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
220 HPPower223 HP
304 NmTorque301 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/70 R16 99STyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4685 mm
1815 mmWidth1825 mm
1665 mmHeight1735 mm
1650 KgWeight1660 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Toyota Harrier and 2000 Toyota Highlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Highlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…