DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Toyota Harrier vs 2013 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Harrier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeJeep
HarrierModelCompass
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,90 s
0 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2493 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
152 HPPower163 HP
206 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4448 mm
1835 mmWidth1812 mm
1690 mmHeight1718 mm
1750-1800 KgWeight1680 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Toyota Harrier and 2013 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…