2003 • Toyota
Harrier
Toyota Harrier 2.4 16V (160 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Toyota Harrier vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Alfa Romeo
166
Alfa Romeo 166 2.4 JTD (140 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Harrier
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota HarrierSpecificationAlfa Romeo 166
ToyotaMakeAlfa Romeo
HarrierModel166
2003Model year2003
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota HarrierSpecificationAlfa Romeo 166
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
160 HPPower140 HP
221 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota HarrierSpecificationAlfa Romeo 166
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank72 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota HarrierSpecificationAlfa Romeo 166
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota HarrierSpecificationAlfa Romeo 166
4730 mmLength4720 mm
1845 mmWidth1815 mm
1680 mmHeight1416 mm
1710 KgWeight1490 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Toyota Harrier and 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…