DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Toyota Harrier vs 1998 Eagle Summit Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Harrier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeEagle
HarrierModelSummit
1998Model year1998
SUV, CrossoverBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2364 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
160 HPPower136 HP
221 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/70 R16 99STyre size205/70 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4280 mm
1815 mmWidth1695 mm
1665 mmHeight1591 mm
1590 KgWeight1390 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Toyota Harrier and 1998 Eagle Summit approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Harrier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…