DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Toyota GT 86 vs 2010 Cadillac BLS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac BLS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeCadillac
GT 86ModelBLS
2014Model year2010
CoupeBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
226 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower210 HP
205 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank58 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
ATTransmission—
17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4240 mmLength4680 mm
1775 mmWidth1752 mm
1285 mmHeight1471 mm
1287 kgWeight—
218 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2675 mm

Additional Features

Toyota GT 86Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsLight SensorFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Toyota GT 86 and 2010 Cadillac BLS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac BLS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…