DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Granvia vs 2000 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeNissan
GranviaModelPathfinder
2000Model year2000
—Body typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2694 ccEngine displacement2664 cc
152 HPPower131 HP
240 NmTorque279 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size235/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4530 mm
—Width1840 mm
—Height1750 mm
—Weight1870 Kg
—Wheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Granvia and 2000 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…