DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Grand Hiace vs 2000 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
Grand HiaceModelTaurus
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2982 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
140 HPPower155 HP
343 NmTorque251 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank68 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4
205/70 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength5019 mm
1800 mmWidth1854 mm
1965 mmHeight1425 mm
—Weight1521 Kg
2985 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Grand Hiace and 2000 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…