DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Toyota Funcargo vs 2016 Toyota Corolla Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Corolla

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 10.25 points.

54.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
FuncargoModelCorolla
2005Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
175 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
106 HPPower132 HP
145 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14TTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3860 mmLength4620 mm
1660 mmWidth1775 mm
1680 mmHeight1465 mm
1075 KgWeight1120-1240 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Toyota Funcargo and 2016 Toyota Corolla approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Corolla leads the E-Kıyasla score by 10.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…