DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Toyota Funcargo vs 2000 Kia Rio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Rio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeKia
FuncargoModelRio
1999Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
175 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
106 HPPower108 HP
145 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size155 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3860 mmLength4215 mm
1660 mmWidth1675 mm
1680 mmHeight1440 mm
1075 KgWeight940 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2410 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Toyota Funcargo and 2000 Kia Rio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Rio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…