DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 BMW X1 vs 2013 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeNissan
X1ModelX-Trail
2013Model year2013
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
190 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
116 HPPower150 HP
260 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank65 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/50 R17 94HTyre size225/60 R17; 225/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4477 mmLength4635 mm
1798 mmWidth1790 mm
1545 mmHeight1700 mm
1555 KgWeight1605 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 BMW X1 and 2013 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…