DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 BMW X1 vs 2010 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeLand Rover
X1ModelFreelander
2009Model year2010
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
218 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
177 HPPower190 HP
350 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank68 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/50 R17 VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4454 mmLength4500 mm
1798 mmWidth—
1545 mmHeight1740 mm
1565 KgWeight1805 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 BMW X1 and 2010 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…