1997 • AC
Cobra
AC Cobra 4.9 V8 (370 Hp) 1997Overall Score77.75/100
1997 AC Cobra vs 2000 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 V8 32V Cobra (324 Hp) 2000Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
AC CobraSpecificationFord Mustang
ACMakeFord
CobraModelMustang
1997Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2+2
2Doors2
Performance
AC CobraSpecificationFord Mustang
5,2 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
215 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
370 HPPower324 HP
579 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
AC CobraSpecificationFord Mustang
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank59 lt
18 ltUrban consumption18 lt
12 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
AC CobraSpecificationFord Mustang
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/65 VR15Tyre size245/45 R17
—ABSYes
Dimensions
AC CobraSpecificationFord Mustang
4115 mmLength4653 mm
1735 mmWidth1857 mm
1245 mmHeight1350 mm
980 KgWeight1615 Kg
2285 mmWheelbase2573 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 AC Cobra and 2000 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…