1999 • Toyota
Crown
Toyota Crown 2.5 24V (200 Hp) 1999Overall Score67.5/100
1999 Toyota Crown vs 2000 Volvo XC70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 2.4 T (200Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Volvo XC70
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CrownSpecificationVolvo XC70
ToyotaMakeVolvo
CrownModelXC70
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Toyota CrownSpecificationVolvo XC70
—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2491 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
255 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CrownSpecificationVolvo XC70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CrownSpecificationVolvo XC70
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CrownSpecificationVolvo XC70
4820 mmLength4733 mm
1765 mmWidth1860 mm
1455 mmHeight1562 mm
1540 KgWeight1630 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2763 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Toyota Crown and 2000 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo XC70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…