DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Crown vs 2005 Smart Forfour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Forfour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeSmart
CrownModelForfour
2003Model year2005
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,9 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
0 HPPower68 HP
56 NmTorque160 Nm
6Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption5,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength3752 mm
1695 mmWidth1684 mm
1525 mmHeight1450 mm
1480 KgWeight965 Kg
2785 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Crown and 2005 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Forfour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…