DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Toyota Cresta vs 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMitsubishi
CrestaModelChallenger
1995Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
220 HPPower185 HP
294 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
205/60 R15 HTyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4530 mm
1750 mmWidth1775 mm
1390 mmHeight1730 mm
1420 KgWeight1830 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Toyota Cresta and 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…