DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Toyota Cresta vs 1990 Mazda 929 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 929

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
CrestaModel929
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats6
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
150 HPPower127 HP
194 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/70 R14 91 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4690 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1427 mm
—Weight1300 Kg
—Wheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Toyota Cresta and 1990 Mazda 929 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 929 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…