DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1988 Toyota Cresta vs 1988 Audi 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Cresta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAudi
CrestaModel90
1988Model year1988
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
150 HPPower115 HP
194 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/60 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4393 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1397 mm
—Weight1110 Kg
—Wheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1988 Toyota Cresta and 1988 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Cresta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…