1994 • Toyota
Corona
Toyota Corona 1.8i 16V EX (125 Hp) 1994Overall Score62.25/100
1994 Toyota Corona vs 1994 Acura Integra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Acura
Integra
Acura Integra 1.8 (170 Hp) 1994Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Corona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CoronaSpecificationAcura Integra
ToyotaMakeAcura
CoronaModelIntegra
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Toyota CoronaSpecificationAcura Integra
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1839 ccEngine displacement1797 cc
125 HPPower170 HP
162 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CoronaSpecificationAcura Integra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CoronaSpecificationAcura Integra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Toyota CoronaSpecificationAcura Integra
4520 mmLength4380 mm
1695 mmWidth1710 mm
1410 mmHeight1338 mm
1130 KgWeight1235 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Toyota Corona and 1994 Acura Integra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Corona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…